CyberTwin
Writing about cybersecurity decisions

How we think about this.

Long-form writing on the architecture decisions, the methodology, and the industry economics that shape how we built CyberTwin. We publish when we have something specific to say. No content marketing for content marketing's sake.

(01)CYBERTWIN · NOTES
(05)May 6, 20267 min read

Why we publish our prices when no one else in security software does

Vanta hides theirs. Drata hides theirs. Cynomi hides theirs. We publish $4,800, $14,400, and $36,000 right on the homepage. Here's the reasoning.

Read post
(04)April 22, 20268 min read

The 'Do Nothing' option, and why every security tool ignores it

Security recommendations always assume you'll do something. But the most important number on any security report is what happens if you don't. Here's why we made it the headline.

Read post
(03)April 8, 202611 min read

How much should a 200-person company spend on security? (Real numbers)

Industry benchmarks say 7-10% of IT budget. That's useless. Here's what 200-person companies actually spend, broken down by category, sector, and risk profile — with sourced numbers.

Read post
(02)March 4, 20269 min read

Three stacks, not a hundred findings

Most security platforms hand you a list of 200 things you're doing wrong. CyberTwin gives you three priced architectures and lets you pick. Here's why that's the more honest output.

Read post
(01)January 15, 20265 min read

Why we built CyberTwin

The mid-market security buying experience is broken. Six-week consultants, GRC tools that list 200 missing controls, vendor reps who all sell the same answer. We built the thing we wished existed.

Read post

Subscribe to new posts via RSS at /blog/rss.

Have a topic you'd want us to write about? Email feedback@cybertwin.io. We respond to every suggestion, even the ones we don't act on.